2014-07-08 14:42 GMT+02:00 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org>: > >>>>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > > > In fact, they did remove ebuilds from the tree in the past for this > > reason [1]. > > Given that this was a live ebuild that failed to compile [2] and was > dumped onto the games team few weeks after it was committed to the > tree [3], I can even understand their reaction, in this particular > case. >
[2] Clear upstream bug, we remove live versions when from time to time upstream break their repo? If you take look on 1.0 it IS almost the same ebuild? [3] I remved myself from maitnainership as I found out I don't have enought time to work on stuff in Gentoo to keep myself only in office and to make them working... So if they didn't want the live version it is perfectly sane reasoning for pruning that before, but removing the 1.0 commited few weeks ago it is just utter stupid approach and reason why I avoid to have to touch anything with games team in Gentoo. Tom > > Ulrich > > > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431552 > [3] > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/games-strategy/openxcom/metadata.xml?hideattic=0&r1=1.1&r2=1.2 >
