On 18/07/14 23:58, Georg Rudoy wrote: > 2014-07-19 0:19 GMT+04:00 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org>: >> So, I propose: >> >> upower with short generic description of "Support for power management" >> udisks with short generic description of "Support for storage management" > Being a proxy maint of lc-vrooby, I support this proposal. > > Also, have you considered udisks2? For example, lc-vrooby can use any > of udisks:0 and udisks:2, but the rdeps that get pulled and the > backends that get compiled are controlled by the flags. >
There should be no separate USE flags for udisks:0 and udisks:2. They can be installed *and* ran at the same time. If both are supported, and it's a compile time option, :2 should be forced If both are supported, and they can be automatically detected at runtime, || ( sys-fs/udisks:2 sys-fs/udisks:0 ) syntax should be used We have a Tracker open for migrating to udisks:2 and adding udisks:0 support is a bug (regression)
