On 27/09/14 15:19, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 27/09/14 14:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 12:47:14 +0200
Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
Because I'd expect a stage3 to be posix compliant

I agree. It's time to replace nano with Vim.


Surely certain stuff might enjoy having ex available as well.

Probably busybox could be enough for both use-cases.

What about documenting this detail somewhere?

lu


Reply via email to