On 20/10/14 00:53, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I debated about whether to write a news item about c++11 abi. Usually > our news items are about some change which requires user intervention. > But this is just precautionary. With more packages needing c++11 > because of source changes, we may want to inform users about breakage at > the ABI level in case they do something like add -std=c++11 to their > global CXXFLAGS. > > Let me know if you think its worth sending out and/or any other > suggestions.
Shorter form: Since gcc-4.7 there is a -std=c++11 option, do not use it since it breaks the ABI, resulting in a non-functional system. lu
