On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote: > On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote: >> So who wants to pick up the pieces now? Because I'm almost pissed off >> enough to turn down the tinderbox and give a big FU to Gentoo already. >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527608 > > More! https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529788 > > Again, is somebody going to stand up and do something or can I shut > down my tinderbox and spend my free time playing Baldur's Gate? >
Guys, can we please give the volunteers who are going around uploading logs time to do their jobs before we go closing bugs as invalid? The logs are going to get attached. If somebody is in a mad rush to actually resolve the bug (heaven forbid), then just click on the link. Per the Council meeting: "The council recommends that bugs from any developer-run tinderbox not be marked invalid based on whether the logs are attached or pointed to by a permanent URL. The council also encourages efforts to automate the attachment of tinderbox logs to improve the quality of the bugzilla record." Aye: blueness, dberkholz, dilfridge, creffet proxy for radhermit, rich0, ulm, williamh Anybody closing these bugs is going against council recommendation, and we appreciate the efforts of mjo to improve our bug records. Let's not go creating work for ourselves by interfering with efforts to document bugs, and run a tinderbox. I appreciate that the bug wranglers add a GREAT deal of value to our bug reports in general, but honestly I think they would do better to just let the scripts do their jobs here. In the interests of not micromanaging everybody and treating people like children we're trying to avoid having a list of 50,000 policies and rules everybody has to read and follow. With efforts to automatically upload logs, this SHOULD be a moot issue. I'm sure this is all the work of well-intentioned individuals who just didn't hear the news. It probably wouldn't have hurt for me to post the Council summary on the list. Can we put this to rest already? -- Rich
