On Saturday 17 January 2015 17:25:15 hasufell wrote: > Patrick Lauer: > > On Friday 16 January 2015 18:29:08 hasufell wrote: > >> Patrick Lauer: > >>> On 01/16/15 23:26, hasufell wrote: > >>>> Patrick Lauer (patrick): > >>>>> patrick 15/01/16 04:16:55 > >>>>> > >>>>> Modified: ChangeLog > >>>>> Added: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild > >>>>> Log: > >>>>> Bump > >>>> > >>>> I expect people to ask me for review if they bump any of my packages. > >>>> That includes QA team members. > >>> > >>> Are you always in such a bad mood? > >> > >> Do you, as QA team member, think that a review workflow improves quality? > > > > No. > > > > Bureaucracy does not improve quality by itself. > > Patrick, I am really sorry, but this answer made me laugh and cry. > > A review workflow is a fundamental concept in programming methodology > and we have decades of experience that taught us how important it is.
But just "add review" or "add agile" doesn't fix quality. Same way Security is not just a checkbox, but a process. (Plus there's the whole manpower thing we'll ignore for now, etc. etc. ...) I'm unwilling to entertain your attempts at baiting me into statements you hope to use against me, and I'm unwilling to play your passive-agressive whining game. > > I have no words to describe how disappointed I am right now. It'll pass, don't worry ...
