You *should* have the information to assign the bug in the build log, provided it's available, as the metadata.xml maintainer information should be printed at the top of it.
I think automating assignment for properly defined package names in bug summaries is something that has been discussed before but never properly implemented. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes https://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On 27 February 2015 at 03:07, Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:00:04 -0800 (PST) Alex Alexander wrote: > > Our bug queue has 89 bugs! > > > > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > > > > To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 > > BTW, maybe this process can be partially automated? In most cases > we have to look for category/package in a bug title and add/cc > mails from metadata.xml to this bug. Of course, in some cases bug > may have references to several packages or no valid references at > all; false assignments are also possible as well as not properly > submitted bugs (e.g. missing build logs and so on) . But in general > such tool should reduce workload greatly. > > Another approach will be to allow users to assign bugs themselves. > > Best regards, > Andrew Savchenko >
