On 14.03.2015 23:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Trying to explain to a new user that the Portage tree refers to the > collection of ebuilds used by a PMS-compliant package manager (eg > Portage) is problematic.
Full ack. Let's limit "portage" to the piece of software, please. > Questions: 0. What names for the tree/repository. It's not a tree. Ideally, it would be a directed acyclic graph (DAG), there maybe be some loops, even. I would therefore object to any name that has "tree" in it. Since there are other Gentoo-based distros, I would say the word "gentoo" should be in there. Plain "gentoo" may work. I would be happy with any of "gentoo-"{core,main,master} as well, if plain "gentoo" causes trouble for a name in some context. > 1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites, > exp; should the tree be in one of those namespaces, a new > namespace, or be without a namespace? > git://anongit.gentoo.org/NEW-NAME.git. Not in any of those namespace, please. If in any, make it "repos" or "repositories", please. Thanks for your consideration. Best, Sebastian