On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:46:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 31 May 2015 12:59, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > I don't understand why one should add append-lfs-flags to almost > > every single package out there. > > no one is suggesting that route. append-lfs-flags is a kludge > (albeit an effective one) in the face of no upstream support. if you > look at the referenced tracker it includes pointers for fixing > packages in ways that can be sent upstream. well, other suggestions are similar, except of course that appending the flags is done upstream in some way or another however, reading more in details the links you provided, what happened to your patch setting _FILE_OFFSET_BITS default to 64 ? ( https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-03/msg00290.html ) which seems to be a much better solution to what i initially proposed.
