On 4 July 2015 at 23:28, Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetrom...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 02:16 +0700, C Bergström wrote: > > 2) I don't understand your comment about signatures. > > Gpg commit signatures [1] which are a requirement for any gentoo git > workflow. Rebasing breaks the author's signature afaict, so the user > who is doing rebasing needs to re-sign the commit using his own key. > > [1] https://git-scm.com/book/tr/v2/Git-Tools-Signing-Your-Work#Signing-Commits >
Maybe this is the root cause of all issues, and simpler was to remain with signed manifests. Just a thought... Not every git feature out there should be actually be leveraged. Doing so would enable rebase without loosing data, more secure (than SHA-1) signatures, using code review tools such as gerrit without an issue, migration out of git in future and probably more.
