On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:27:02PM +0200, eroen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:49:08PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > I'm still looking for ideas of ways to avoid making this a breaking > > change. If it isn't possible to make it a non-breaking change, this will > > force openrc-1.0 to be the first release where we can do this (going > > from 0.x to 1.x signifies breaking changes in semantic versioning [1]). > > > [1] http://www.semver.org > > This is a valid and possible versioning policy, but it is not semver. > Your [1] states: > > 4. Major version zero (0.y.z) is for initial development. Anything may > change at any time. The public API should not be considered stable.
The problem is that version 0 hit stable before I knew about semver, so I have to treat version 0 as version 1. I can't just randomly break things from 0.17 to 0.18 for example. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
