On 01 Oct 2015 22:24, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-10-01, o godz. 16:15:32 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): > > On 01 Oct 2015 21:10, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Dnia 2015-09-29, o godz. 10:21:14 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): > > > > if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against > > > > libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you > > > > didn't > > > > notice?), there's a new package you should convert to using: > > > > sys-libs/binutils-libs > > > > > > What about packages building binutils plugins? Should them be using > > > binutils-libs too, or somehow binding to a specific binutils version? > > > > the only thing you need is the header file right ? binutils-libs provides > > those. if you need something else, you'll need to provide concrete details. > > Yes. But shouldn't I be concerned about potential ABI mismatch between > binutils-libs and the active linker?
probably, but that's already the case today. i don't think binutils-libs
changes the status quo. something to think about in:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/494228
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
