-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/11/2015 01:21 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand > <k...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> Another thing that strikes me is separation of stable vs ~arch >> behavior. >>
.. > > I'm not sure that we're doing stable users a favor by not > "disturbing" them with rebuilds but instead we're just silently > breaking their systems in subtle ways. I think that if anybody > would benefit from a more conservative approach it would be the > stable users. I think we are mostly in agreement, actually, the point wasn't about the rebuild following a bump (which is necessary for vdb update and indeed gets rid of issues down the road), it was more about whether it is prudent to change eclasses used by stable packages without bumping revision, and being careful in this consideration when selecting to set deps in eclasses rather than directly in ebuild in the first place. > > I'm all for having a separate discussion around when it is and > isn't appropriate to modify eclasses that are used by stable > packages in the first place. Yeah, I don't think this discussion impacts the proposals you've outlined for dyndeps, thanks for summing things up. - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWGkguAAoJECULev7WN52Fz7AIAK9CqQTXmduz17pydV4yzHwX VIkEQ/5p+BoJixEceSLJo1KN2IBcDNHeZeyUgjxbY3yO/LuB+VzNzQk87gvaAKGw EY81KJy7Y44vzejeMR1k1c7nnAtgaoyYgd2xAce57BPwvHVRtNJPTZeyvOunQiMo bq5fB2IMrPrd59NdaM0ncF2Z5Cpx/0RMMyo2tQK2wTdF7I4upzjWiR9EwM39yyhC OIHLXO6pj+1fFxrtUAPV5lnBs15FxRKwLRNfDOcvhOKlHnjgr9QinJcG4gvczq7+ v/Faw/NNO1b5qzYcprQsvWEk4lBvy29RF555cBxvEWU3z9LhyDbXdQldY6QNy4c= =9Vcc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
