On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:29:26 +0800 Ian Delaney<idel...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:16:01 +0200 > hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On 10/12/2015 06:56 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > > > So work with the reviewers to ensure the communication is tactful > > > and graceful. > > > > > > > That would be appreciated. So far, we mostly got people complaining > > (and some setting up sieve filters to throw all our mails to > > trash), > > what does this tell you? > > but not people offering help. The latter has a bigger chance of > > actually having an impact. > > > > > > Not sure how to read this. The whole idea is for provider / client to > communicate and negotiate a workable solution. At a glance this reads > as the user needs to adapt to the service that the client is offering > and appease the provider. What's wrong with this picture? > > How exactly may I ask does anyone actually offer help to the Reviewers > project whose whole aim it seems is to help all us who cannot write > ebuilds right? By going along with your flow, with neither question > nor comment? Where is the part about the educators leading the way > with tact and grace? Who is the leader here? > They might have failed to notify it, but I think they've taken into account most, if not all, of the problems that had been pointed out: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Reviewers/Internal_policy
