On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:23:55 -0800 Brian Dolbec <dol...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:02:15 +0100 > Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:53:17 +1100 > > Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > +1 > > > > even if I sometimes use those cmake-utils_use*, they tend to confuse > > me and find -DABCD=$(usex ...) much easier to understand for the > > occasional user of cmake-utils.eclass. > > > > > Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I thought EAPI 6 specifications were > finalized. > > Doesn't that mean this will have to wait for EAPI 7? It's eclass API, so it's free to change anytime. Using a new EAPI to change eclass API has the benefit that you can ban new uses of deprecated functions without breaking existing ebuilds. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgppUCVhwHQzy.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
