On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 06:16:40 +0000 (UTC) "Alon Bar-Lev" <alo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> commit: 1519f072b810c69428badbe5fc54960f1a2a12b3 > Author: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> > AuthorDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000 > Commit: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> > CommitDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000 > URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1519f072 > > dev-libs/libgcrypt: cleanup > > Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 > > dev-libs/libgcrypt/Manifest | 1 - > .../libgcrypt/files/libgcrypt-1.5.0-uscore.patch | 33 --------- > .../files/libgcrypt-1.5.4-clang-arm.patch | 84 > ---------------------- > dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r1.ebuild | 57 --------------- > dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r100.ebuild | 58 --------------- Isn't the point of compatibility slots like :11 there that they should be kept for binary packages to work? Because you just removed that, plus all 1.5* versions, effectively causing huge breakage: https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1193 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1219 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1082 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1108 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1134 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1997 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l208 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l234 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l249 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l460 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l898 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l2088 Please fix this ASAP and next time check reverse dependencies before removing packages. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpegEKf7n1jL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature