On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now
And a related question: How would I actually verify the signatures in a meaningful way? ... and why is that not default then.
On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now
And a related question: How would I actually verify the signatures in a meaningful way? ... and why is that not default then.