-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/12/15 16:11, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> 
>>> It is worth noting that GLEP 42 makes no mention of EAPI, and 
>>> current versions of portage do support slots in dependency
>>> atoms used in news items.
>> 
>>> I guess it's a matter of documenting this somewhere. Where
>>> would that be?
>> 
>> We should update GLEP 42 and introduce a News-Item-Format 1.1
>> that supports EAPI 5 for dependency syntax.
>> 
>> (This has come up several times in the past already, but for
>> some reason nobody is willing to take the initiative for updating
>> the GLEP. Everyone seems to be happy with a workaround for their
>> own news item.)
> 
> Thank you. After skimming thought GLEP 1 to refresh my memory, I
> have filed bug 568068 to propose the change.
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568068
> 

The council has been approved NEWS item format 1.1 supporting EAPI=5
style package dependency specification.

Justin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0
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=wBq6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to