-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Manuel Rüger: > On 17.01.2016 08:55, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: >> Replace "cvs commit" with the equivalent "git add && git commit" >> version. >> >> X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558642 >> Signed-off-by: Gokturk Yuksek <gokt...@binghamton.edu> >> >> diff --git a/ebuild-writing/misc-files/metadata/text.xml >> b/ebuild-writing/misc-files/metadata/text.xml index >> e506b1c..a8beacc 100644 --- >> a/ebuild-writing/misc-files/metadata/text.xml +++ >> b/ebuild-writing/misc-files/metadata/text.xml @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ >> is currently: <pre> xmllint --noout --valid metadata.xml >> glep31check metadata.xml -cvs commit -m "Adding category >> metadata.xml for my-category" metadata.xml +git add metadata.xml >> +git commit --gpg-sign -m "Adding category metadata.xml for >> my-category" </pre> >> >> </body> >> > > Can we discourage to use "-m" and prefer to open up an editor > instead? > I think the purpose of "-m" is only to illustrate the example of adding a category with a proper message rather than suggesting a workflow. Note that the section for committing packages suggests "repoman commit" which opens up an editor by default.
Is there a particular reason why we should discourage the use of "-m"? > Cheers, > > Manuel > - -- gokturk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWnBQ3AAoJEIT4AuXAiM4zkeUH/AuswPQV3Fw+aeuI08l8xjpx q+BVZ8c7/5RNqgsQGF/0uKnkZI70WwbkLQwsk2nlHKXjuL5qUWmQ16YBC+fF03SG JD5eiFhqnzUK79Y5i2Rnfoc2o6DlcLzBSXHXMjtVldg4ufsq+v7mP+Jw901MyJu+ VBY6gkjmkqsahXeaPqmuoXslcr3yQtDHKVU4m9YOptZ/0jTDg4asnvhpv6ERwdNL uSrO4hzdbh314/o/R/4TWhGV56wlRVUaelzaVwDaBt2wxY5gYyKWhRizN5Exu8/w BlWSDqwfpKbvHMS2ArrDh0PvvWqEZAMhNuXX2hateO2wQIJlrWZ5KSId5ioW0fw= =s7Dj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
