Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

[M. J. Everitt]

On 09/02/16 23:38, Alex McWhirter wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 05:39 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> I'd agree, except that the way we're running udev is strongly discouraged 
>> and generally not supported by upstream, with a statement that it /will/ 
>> break in the future, it's simply a matter of time. 
>>
>> Which makes a big difference when supporting that same specific use-case 
>> is the primary and arguably only reason the considered alternative exists.
>>
>> IOW, it's not about not liking upstream.  It's about choosing a default 
>> that supports our default use-case.
>>
> My point exactly. When this happens we either make something like eudev
> default or we have to make systemd default. I don't really care which as
> long as i still have the option to change it.
>
+1