On 07/04/16 17:36, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Thursday, April 7, 2016 6:22:16 PM CEST, Rich Freeman wrote: >> Again, I don't see this as a reason not to make it optional, but I >> suspect that we will find bugs here from time to time which users who >> run with the split /usr will have to report/fix. > > > Considering the advantages of usr-merge are rather specific IMHO but > risks during the migration are high, I think you're optimistic on the > user base of usr-merged systems :) > > Heck, it hasn't happened yet because there hasn't been such a big need > for it. > In the spirit of hearing arguments for/against .. could someone with the appropriate 'fu' throw up a quick survey for those on this ML (and/or possibly the g-users?) to indicate a preference for a change to a flattened-/usr system?
I did think re: the eudev "debate" that it was really hard to quantify the opinion for and against a change, and take it away from the vocal people that obviously feel passionately about their cause :) .
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
