On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:29:08 +0200 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I didn't initially wanted to do the profile either but some > > developers have refused to support this 'unsupported configuration'. > > I assume that having an official profile will ensure better > > cooperation. > > IMHO we should create additional profiles only if there are valid > technical reasons, but not because of social reasons. > > Even more so as the profile in question is intended to be used by > developers only. Like the 'developer' profile? But I guess there's no need for explicit profile when the changes can be easily done via make.conf. At least for the moment. However, the three remaining patches still stand. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgp6VsKMoscgz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
