On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:05:05PM +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:08:30 -0400 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > >On 8/23/16 8:03 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > >> I have some kind of interest for these packages: > > > >Lars, maybe once we get some names we should get a meeting of > >base-system together and coordinate our efforts. In particular, I > >mostly have interest in those packages that make up @system for the > >stages I build. > > > > Guys, I'd like to take the opportunity to "revive" the #gentoo-base IRC > channel for coordination between base-system developers. > Perhaps "revive" is not the appropriate word considering that the > channel never stopped to exist but rather became extinct. > > Opinions?
Sure, I'm fine with using it; I'm there anyway. > Furthermore what about the devs currently being listed in base-system > team but stopped taking care of the team's packages for years? I would say contact them individually and ask them if they want to stay on the team. > Oh, and to all new team members: > Please keep in mind to *not* use EAPI-6 for base-system packages yet, so > we can retain a somewhat stable upgrade path even for very old systems. This was always a huge mistery that never really made sense. Once the pm is upgraded on a system to eapi 6, I don't see the reason to hold back any base system packages to older eapis, especially once eapi 6 has been stable for a year. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
