On 10/01/2016 12:45 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:12:26 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand: >> On 10/01/2016 12:09 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >>> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:01:54 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand: >>>>> This *will* break the following ebuilds: >>>>> >>>>> www-apps/bugzilla-4.4.12 >>>>> www-apps/bugzilla-5.0.3 >>>>> www-apache/mod_limitipconn-0.24-r2 >>>>> www-apache/mod_nss-1.0.12-r1 >>>>> app-eselect/eselect-php-0.9.1 >>>>> net-analyzer/pnp4nagios-0.6.25-r3 >>>>> net-analyzer/icinga2-2.4.10-r1 >>>> >>>> Several of these ebuilds are in stable, so I strongly oppose any action >>>> that breaks existing ebuilds. >>> >>> Right. So instead I'll ad a big fat and ugly ewarn message, but I'll do >>> that right now. :) > >> As its not user-breaking/affecting, I believe ewarn is wrong as well. >> Should just open bug reports towards the affected packages with a tracker > > I agree that what we really need here is eqawarn ... > > However I *want* the message to be loud and obnoxious. > We need eblinkwarn ... :o) >
I don't see why users should be bothered with maintainer mistakes that doesn't affect them (in this particular circumstance) -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
