On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 19:39:33 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote: > The two ways are not the same, and there is a reason sets exist in the > first place. People seem to be over looking that fact. I did not add > sets. They are not new. I am simply trying to expand their use.
Sets exist because people keep saying "let's have sets!" without agreeing on what sets actually are or how they are to be used. Sets remain half-baked because it turns out they don't make consistent sense in different contexts when you give them a non-superficial amount of thought. -- Ciaran McCreesh
