On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:30:07 -0400 Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. > <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:55:47 -0400 > > Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> The --unmerge option is there to let people shoot themselves in the > >> feet if they know what they're doing. > > > > Not sure why anyone would have objection to such a warning like > > exists for other things. > > I don't think I've seen anybody raise such an objection. Then why are we talking -c vs -C, when BOTH need more output... If there is no objection, why all the emails on -c vs -C? Neither using -c nor -C addresses the issues I am mentioning with either. Yet people keep on about those two things and missing the actual point. Which you say there is no objection. Maybe there is no understanding rather than objection. If people understood, then saying use -c or -C makes no sense. It does not address the lack of output from either I am talking about. -- William L. Thomson Jr.
pgpcg5sIKTB6H.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
