On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017, 01:22:44 CEST schrieb Peter Stuge: > > > > I hold a perhaps radical view: I would like to simply remove stable. > > > > I continue to feel that maintaining two worlds (stable+unstable) > > carries with it an unneccessary cost. > > > > That's not feasible. It would kill off any semi-professional or > professional > Gentoo use, where a minimum of stability is required. > So my argument (for years) has been that this is the right thing all along. If people want a stable Gentoo, fork it and maintain it downstream of the rambunctious rolling distro. > > (Try keeping ~10 machines on stable running without automation. That's > already > quite some work. Now try the same with ~arch. Now imagine you're talking > about > 100 or 1000 machines.) > > -- > Andreas K. Hüttel > dilfri...@gentoo.org > Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
