Am Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018, 12:46:53 CET schrieb Anthony G. Basile: > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying to design an update system for many identical Gentoo systems. > Using a binhost is obvious, but there are still problems with this > approach. > > Unless there's some magic I don't know about (and this is why I'm > sending this email) each machine still needs to have the portage tree > installed locally (1.5 GB) or somehow mounted by a network filesystem > (which is not practical if the machines are not on a local network). > Furthermore, each machine would have to run emerge locally to do the > calculation of what packages need updating. > > This procedure is redundant because each machine is housing the same > data and doing the same dependence-tree calculation. It should be > possible to do this calculation on a centralized binhost and simply > communicate the update information to the remote machines. They would > then only have to download the .tbz2's and install them, keeping a tidy > /var/db/pkg. Thus they avoid having to house the portage tree and > burning cpu cycles that just calculate redundant information. > > I'm inspired here by OpenBSD's pkg_add which doesn't require all of > ports to be installed, and mender which is a > > Any ideas?
what about app-portage/portage-utils? AFAIK doesn't need a local portage tree...
