On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > W dniu czw, 25.01.2018 o godzinie 15∶55 -0600, użytkownik R0b0t1 > napisał: >> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > W dniu czw, 25.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶37 +0000, użytkownik Robin H. >> > Johnson napisał: >> > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 01:35:17PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >> > > > Title: Portage rsync tree verification >> > > > Author: Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> >> > > > Posted: 2018-01-xx >> > > > Revision: 1 >> > > > News-Item-Format: 2.0 >> > > > Display-If-Installed: <sys-apps/portage-2.3.21 >> > > >> > > Drop Display-If-Installed, they need to always see this until they know >> > > it was bootstrapped. >> > >> > Well, the idea was that if someone starts with stage that has >2.3.21, >> > then he has bootstrapped via verifying the stage signature. >> > >> > > > Starting with sys-apps/portage-2.3.22, Portage enables cryptographic >> > > > verification of the Gentoo rsync repository distributed over rsync >> > > > by default. >> > > >> > > Seems very wordy, suggested cleanup: >> > > > > Starting with sys-apps/portage-2.3.22, Portage will verify the Gentoo >> > > > > repository after rsync by default. >> > > > >> > > > This aims to prevent malicious third parties from altering >> > > > the contents of the ebuild repository received by our users. >> > > > >> > > > This does not affect users syncing using git and other methods. >> > > > Appropriate verification mechanisms for them will be provided >> > > > in the future. >> > > >> > > Note that emerge-webrsync has verification via FEATURES=webrsync-gpg? >> > >> > I'm sorry, I have never used that. Does it cover full key maintenance >> > or rely on user to do the gpg work? >> > >> >> It used to be necessary to set up a GnuPG home for portage and pull >> the keys in, but now users can emerge app-crypt/gentoo-keys and set >> PORTAGE_GPG_DIR="/var/lib/gentoo/gkeys/keyrings/gentoo/release". >> > > In that case I'd rather not announce it until it is integrated properly. >
What is "properly?" It's referenced in the handbook. Cheers, R0b0t1