On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 03:54:35PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/09/2018 03:27 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > On 09/07/18 23:12, Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 07/09/2018 02:34 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > >>> I'd mostly argue any such change should only affect new systems > >>> > >> Yes, changing defaults for existing systems would be annoying. > >> > >> My recommendation is to have catalyst set the new defaults in the stage > >> tarballs. > >> > >> When sys-apps/portage changes its internal defaults, I'd like for the > >> upgrade process to call a tool that generates configuration files when > >> necessary to ensure that the existing paths remain constant. > > I think it should be possible for RelEng to make a start on catalyst > > updates - is there anything that would inhibit going ahead with this, > > potentially? > > No, nothing. Whatever catalyst puts it the default config will become > our new default.
I would still like to see notice about what the new defaults are and how to migrate current systems to them. Thanks, William > -- > Thanks, > Zac >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
