Michał Górny schrieb:
So maybe mask it, but not remove?
Maybe it's time you realize that if you want something to stay, then you
need to actually *take it* and *fix it*. Keeping clearly broken stuff
so that every user could try jumping through a few hoops to build it has
no value.
I think it is a valid concern that removal of packages may sometimes be
overzealous, and to better keep packages in the tree as long as they are
useful and workarounds exist for build/runtime problems. Just in case of
gnash there is really no benefit in keeping it.
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
