On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:46 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 8/2/19 5:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Sure. Please preferably address two of them separately, so we can > > commit the 0 patch first, and -1 when CI is ready. > > > > Maybe I'm just feeling cynical, but what do we gain by adding support > for something that no real package should do? Is it just to avoid > thinking up any number and typing it in? >
Given that overlays won't do proper assignment, the numbers they choose may collide with numbers used in ::gentoo. Forcing explicit assignment from dynamic range is cleaner in that regard. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part