On 9/18/19 5:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> >> I don't really understand why you're adding it to *this* eclass. Isn't >> it true for all Go packages? So I suppose golang-* eclasses are >> affected as well. > > You are correct, they are affected. No one, including myself, caught > that during the review cycle for those eclasses.
I've been bitching about this for at least four years: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/2e89a3ccf9ceb4b61418d0ce30939f92
