Dnia October 29, 2019 9:34:01 AM UTC, Fabian Groffen <grob...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): >On 29-10-2019 05:27:37 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 00:24 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn >wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > > Today you get chastised for using /space/distfiles-local and not >> > > following policy changes. The devmanual states that it's >deprecated >> > > since at least 2011, and talks of using d.g.o [1]. >> > > [1] >> > >https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/mirrors/index.html#suitable-download-hosts >> > >> > Sorry I'm late to the party, but I would like to enquire about what >happens >> > if a file with existing filename but different b2sum gets uploaded >to >> > /space/distfiles-local now? >> >> The same as before. It gets put in top-level disfiles directory. >> Hashes are calculated from filenames, so this wouldn't affect it. >That >> is, if it put those files in subdirectories in the first place >because >> it doesn't. > >/space/distfiles-local is no longer copied to the mirrors? or just not >copied in the subdir-hierarchy?
The latter. > >> > Doing so and updating the Manifest used to be another (not >necessarily >> > preferred) method to address upstream remaking release packages. >> > >> >> It's no longer valid. > >Just wondering. Do you mean it isn't valid that some upstreams do this >(yes horror)? We surely need a way to work around that ... I mean the method using same filename and expecting distfiles-local to overwrite it. It is preferable to just rename it. > >Thanks, >Fabian -- Best regards, Michał Górny
