On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 22:27:23 +1100 Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply here. > > On 10/3/19 1:43 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:29 AM Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> I noticed that stable-bot stopped marking bugs as verified for > >> stbilization. > >> Example: > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/695252 > >> > >> 1. Is it gone forever and arch teams should stop relying on it's presence? > >> > > There was some temporary, unintentional breakage which regrettably I did > not notice. Thanks to whissi for pinging me. > > >> 2. If not can the owner tweak it? > > stable-bot has since returned to normal service. > > >> 3. Can we have a wiki page that describes the setup and who to send > >> reports to? > >> Doc would be useful to run it locally, send bugs/enhancements, post > >> current > >> status if it's known to be broken. > > I agree, this is long overdue. > > > It looks like it is working now, but I think we really should know a few > > things: > > > > (1) Who maintains it > > That is me. > > > (2) Where the code is > Due to slacking on my part, the code currently just lives on my server. > The intention has always been to clean it up and publish it with the > client at https://github.com/kensington/bugbot. > > > (3) and perhaps what happened to bring it down > vixie-cron got last-rited and I neglected to configure its placement > correctly. > I've added a stub page for stable bot: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Stable_bot Eeveryone, feel free to dump more stuff there. -- Sergei
