Il giorno lun 10 feb 2020 alle ore 08:20 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> ha scritto:
> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:51 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > > In that case, I suppose we'll have to apply consistency manually? Can we > > all agree on a global order of preference for the relevant packages? > > That would be my idea, yes. I'd suggest going for the 'lightest' > package first. Would you be able to figure out some kind of measure > on how heavy each of those packages is? I suppose we need to account > for build time and dependencies. > > All of these packages are pretty old and not receiving commits in years, may I suggest that the order should be from the less prone to break to the most prone to break? I'll leave to maintainers decide on how to assign a vote on resilience, but monitoring upstream, active forks and other distro should be taken in account. Best, Francesco
