On 5/23/20 1:41 PM, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote: > Am 23.05.2020 um 22:20 schrieb Zac Medico: >> On 5/23/20 1:02 PM, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote: >>> I rewrote e-file in python by using the portage API [1]. But loading the >>> API slows down the whole script. Is there any way to speed up my >>> implementation? Have I done something fundamentally wrong? >> >> When I patched the portage API out of your script, I saw the run time >> drop from 4.2 seconds to 3.2 seconds with this patch: >> ... >> >> Are your results worse than mine? > > Nope, but maybe the phrase "loading the API" was misleading. I'd like to > replace it with: "But using the API slows down the whole script.". This > means it is much slower to get the additional informations by portage > API than just grep'ing throught the ebuild files. If I run the python > e-file on my machine it takes 3.2 seconds for a single file. The bash > e-file show the same result within a second or so. > > regards > Daniel > >
Since the portage API only added about 1 second to the python script time, I guess it's on par with your bash implementation. ;-P -- Thanks, Zac
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
