On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:05:38 +0200 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-06-20 at 14:57 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > Give maintainers the chance to act and flag packages that pull in > > python:2.7. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> > > --- > > profiles/package.deprecated | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/profiles/package.deprecated b/profiles/package.deprecated > > index a756e845f47..bb661571962 100644 > > --- a/profiles/package.deprecated > > +++ b/profiles/package.deprecated > > @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ > > > > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- > > > > +# Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> (2020-06-20) > > +# Deprecated. Consider poring to python 3 and drop support for python2. > > +dev-lang/python:2.7 > > + > > # Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> (2020-02-22) > > # virtual/libstdc++ has only one sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 provider. > > # Use that instead. Or even better use none of them. It's a > > It will trigger the same for packages that support *only* > Python 2.7, as well as these that support 2.7 in addition to 3 because > they have 2.7 deps. If we expect actions by developers on both cases I don't see a problem with that. -- Sergei
pgp9G4XWt3F8Y.pgp
Description: Цифровая подпись OpenPGP
