On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 17:50 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2021-01-04 17:38, Michał Górny wrote: > > You've actually added 'portage' to group 'thomas'. > > Yes, I know that. > > Well, I understand why this might be confusing for you. Like I was using > portage as example for the described example when you give another > service access to a socket like shown in my memcached/redis example. > >
This is confusing to me (as is probably to everybody else) because your text is saying the exact opposite. | Add your user to portage's group [...] You're doing the exact opposite. Maybe it's time to admit that you've made a mistake, and you've made the same mistake the second time in a row, and although it was proven wrong before you still keep trying to support your arguments with this mistake. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
