Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

[Miroslav Šulc]

Dne 15. 04. 21 v 18:35 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a):
Yes, I found the error in dev-java/icedtea-web. Q: Should one use 
JDK_HOME or JAVA_HOME in ebuilds? 

i guess it doesn't matter (at least for packages that inherit 
java-utils-2.eclass):

https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/eclass/java-utils-2.eclass#L2711

However, BDEPEND vs DEPEND is still outstanding. I don't think it is wrong to 
use BDEPEND here?

Also, RDEPEND does not seem to matter, only BDEPEND

this thread is about packages inheriting a java eclass, which 
icedtea-web isn't, so it works in a different way. i never touched that 
package so cannot give you more details, but you can join us at 
#gentoo-j...@freenode.net and address gyakovlev there.

fordfrog