On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 20:01 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 27 Sep 2021, Michał Górny wrote: > > > You seem to be missing the fact that all of them hardcode "bzr". > > Yes, and it is updated to "brz" in a followup commit. Would you prefer > leaving them as "bzr"? I guess that backwards compatibility link will > stay there for a long time.
What I'm saying is that if anyone overrides these commands, they will be broken when the symlink disappears. Then ofc there's the basic problem if anyone will ever actually need to do that. This doesn't sound likely for eclass that we expect to have approximately one consumer. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
