El jue, 11-11-2021 a las 12:48 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió: > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > > > We could: > > > - Open some part of the range between 500 and 1000. For example, > > > 500..799, which would leave 200 IDs for dynamic allocation. > > > +1, since I am not aware of any significant downsides doing so. > > > Could you elaborate why the range 500-799 only leaves us with 200 IDs? > > We still need some range for dynamic allocation. Currently that is > 500..999, and would be reduced to 800..999. That seems to be on the low > side already. > > In any case, 300 additional IDs may not be future proof at the rate > we're currently allocating them. So I wonder if we shouldn't move to > above 60000 immediately, or alternatively, give up the whole concept. > > Ulrich
Personally I would move to >60000 and keep the 300 additional IDs for the case some software really really needs them
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
