El jue, 23-12-2021 a las 17:46 -0500, Matt Turner escribió: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 4:36 PM tastytea <gen...@tastytea.de> wrote: > > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case > > an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about > > “secret-service”? > > I think this is a good idea. >
And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will understand what "secret*" means in this context
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
