Hello all, I noticed that we have many people that, after received a bug report, ask for what the reported 'qa notice' means.
Sometimes there is a tracker and people can take an hint from the resolved bugs but when there aren't a lot of info I feel they are a bit lost. Today, by pure chance, I stumbled upon the "Rust Compiler Error Index" and I thought: why we don't do the same thing with our qa notices? I think that devmanual could be the right place and each QA notice should have an 'identification code'. In that way we can link the error in the qa notice like: https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/qa-notices/qa0001[1] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/qa-notices/qa0002[2] and so on. Reference: https://doc.rust-lang.org/error-index.html[3] What do you think? Agostino -------- [1] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/qa-notices/qa0001 [2] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/qa-notices/qa0002 [3] https://doc.rust-lang.org/error-index.html
