On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 01:55:50PM +0500, A wrote: > On 2022-07-23 01:11, Sam James wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/808779 > > > --- > > metadata.dtd | 2 +- > > XSD needs to be updated too (and wiki, and soko, and pkgcheck...)
sam added the list of what needs to be done himself on the wiki[1] :) And currently only the first step is listed for ML review. [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Upstream_remote-id_types > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/metadata.dtd b/metadata.dtd > > index 581943e..1297548 100644 > > --- a/metadata.dtd > > +++ b/metadata.dtd > > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ > > <!ELEMENT bugs-to (#PCDATA)> > > <!-- specify a type of package identification tracker --> > > <!ELEMENT remote-id (#PCDATA)> > > - <!ATTLIST remote-id type > > (bitbucket|cpan|cpan-module|cpe|cran|ctan|gentoo|github|gitlab|google-code|heptapod|launchpad|osdn|pear|pecl|pypi|rubygems|sourceforge|vim) > > #REQUIRED> > > + <!ATTLIST remote-id type > > (bitbucket|cpan|cpan-module|cpe|cran|ctan|gentoo|github|gitlab|google-code|heptapod|launchpad|osdn|pear|pecl|pypi|rubygems|sourceforge|sourcehut|vim) > > #REQUIRED> > > I'd use "srht" as it's the name of main instance. Everyone can run their > own instance of sourcehut. Same goes for gitlab, and I doubt someone else who would host their own sourcehut would call themselves "sourcehut", it'd be e.g. freedesktop's gitlab with likely a "freedesktop" remote-id. I'm fine with either, but the more readable+recognizable choice sounds fair to me. > > > <!-- category/package information for cross-linking in descriptions > > and useflag descriptions --> > > -- > > 2.37.1 > > > > > -- ionen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature