On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 01:55:50PM +0500, A wrote:
> On 2022-07-23 01:11, Sam James wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org>
> 
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/808779
> 
> > ---
> >  metadata.dtd | 2 +-
> 
> XSD needs to be updated too (and wiki, and soko, and pkgcheck...)

sam added the list of what needs to be done himself on the wiki[1] :)
And currently only the first step is listed for ML review.

[1] 
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Upstream_remote-id_types

> 
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/metadata.dtd b/metadata.dtd
> > index 581943e..1297548 100644
> > --- a/metadata.dtd
> > +++ b/metadata.dtd
> > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
> >      <!ELEMENT bugs-to (#PCDATA)>
> >      <!-- specify a type of package identification tracker -->
> >      <!ELEMENT remote-id (#PCDATA)>
> > -      <!ATTLIST remote-id type 
> > (bitbucket|cpan|cpan-module|cpe|cran|ctan|gentoo|github|gitlab|google-code|heptapod|launchpad|osdn|pear|pecl|pypi|rubygems|sourceforge|vim)
> >  #REQUIRED>
> > +      <!ATTLIST remote-id type 
> > (bitbucket|cpan|cpan-module|cpe|cran|ctan|gentoo|github|gitlab|google-code|heptapod|launchpad|osdn|pear|pecl|pypi|rubygems|sourceforge|sourcehut|vim)
> >  #REQUIRED>
> 
> I'd use "srht" as it's the name of main instance. Everyone can run their
> own instance of sourcehut.

Same goes for gitlab, and I doubt someone else who would host their own
sourcehut would call themselves "sourcehut", it'd be e.g. freedesktop's
gitlab with likely a "freedesktop" remote-id.

I'm fine with either, but the more readable+recognizable choice sounds
fair to me.

>   
> >    <!-- category/package information for cross-linking in descriptions
> >      and useflag descriptions -->
> > -- 
> > 2.37.1
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
ionen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to