So much yapping on the mailing lists, and no response in the bug which triggered the last rites...
So, Peter, do you use Boa? If you do, what niche does it fill that isn't filled by anything else? There are multiple CVEs for it, is it really on us to discriminate between which CVEs are valid and which are not? We can't possibly hope to do that accurately in all cases. On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:20:40PM +0000, Peter Stuge wrote: > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Shouldn't this process work a lot better? > > > > Processes tend to work better when people are contributing towards > > making the processes work better rather than complaining from their > > comfy armchairs that they tend to confuse with thrones. > > LOL! > > Are you honestly arguing that the Gentoo lastriting process relies on > third party contributions to work or improve? That would amount to > declaring Gentoo (developers) incapable of self-improvement, something > that would be absolutely unacceptable to say about any one or any group > of people. > > If you feel that Gentoo is unsustainable like that then please think > about how you should react to it. > > > Instead of writing a passive aggressive response to my demonstration > of this process failure I wish that you would have drawn on your > knowledge of the process and the learnings in my mail to 1. educate > us on what gaps you see, if any, that caused this particular error, > and maybe even 2. suggest some improvements. > > Expecting and/or demanding that from me because I dared describe a > symptom and question the process is neither reasonable nor fair nor > useful. Shooting the messenger reveals that you can't deal with the > message, but that's a you problem, it's not okay to project that onto > the messenger or anyone else. > > > If you wanted to encourage me to become a Gentoo developer and (among > other things) improve the lastriting process then you missed the mark, > in fact your behavior consistently remains one strong reason for me > to *not* become a Gentoo developer. > > > Kind regards > > //Peter >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
