Ulrich Müller <u...@gentoo.org> writes: > At this point, almost all upstreams will have switched to configure.ac. > Therefore, configure.in is most likely an indication of an inactive > upstream, and there is no useful way for the ebuild maintainer to > silence the warning (other than the ebuild renaming the file).
Ionen's point was that such packages therefore regularly get updates so a QA warning when rarely revbumping it isn't necessarily a problem either. But I also don't think it's likely that upstream will ever actually enforce this, so OK. > > Keep the message as einfo, so there is still an indication that the file > was renamed. > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/426262 > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <u...@gentoo.org> > --- > eclass/autotools.eclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/autotools.eclass b/eclass/autotools.eclass > index 91046b9f82f3..3a040b863eea 100644 > --- a/eclass/autotools.eclass > +++ b/eclass/autotools.eclass > @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ eautoconf() { > *) > # Move configure file to the new location only > on newer EAPIs to ensure > # checks are done rather than retroactively > breaking ebuilds. > - eqawarn "Moving configure.in to configure.ac > (bug #426262)" > + einfo "Moving configure.in to configure.ac (bug > #426262)" > mv configure.{in,ac} || die > ;; > esac
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
