Joshua Kinard <ku...@gentoo.org> writes: > Noticing that the ebuild for gcc-12.3.0 got dropped with little > explanation. It is the upstream stable release. I am eyeballing > #906310 as what may have triggered the drop, but I find it a bit of a > stretch that an upstream stable release got dropped over a single, > optional package that has a history of quirky behavior (FWIW, I never > had luck with ccache, especially on MIPS).
Please see https://bugs.gentoo.org/908258. There were miscompilations even fixed after 12.3.0 was tagged. (Also, ccache really isn't a "package with quirky behaviour" in terms of whether or not it causes gcc to ICE. It has nothing to do with what ccache itself does at runtime.) >> > Under qemu, it takes about 4 hours to build the single-ABI variant of > gcc and 7 hours for the multilib variant. So I avoid rebuilding the > compiler as much as possible, as with six chroots, that's virtually an > entire day across all six just for gcc, minus distractions (seriously, > the build times on gcc are getting waaaaaaay out of hand, regardless > of arch). It should get a bit better as of recent 13 as we backported a change to help parallel builds at least (and reduce resource consumption). (Also, added toolchain@ to CC...)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
