>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Andrey Grozin wrote: > OK, sbcl is masked on musl. But why clisp, ecls, or gcl cannot be used > in the amd64 musl profile?
> (I don't know if they actually work on amd64 musl systems, or if > anybody ever tried to do so. I just ask a formal question about Gentoo > profiles system.) pkgcheck's mesage was this: RequiredUseDefaults: version 5.47.0: profile: 'default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl' (3 total) failed REQUIRED_USE: ( clisp || clozurecl || clozurecl64 || cmucl || ecls || gcl || sbcl ) I think what happens is this: sbcl is masked on musl, but it is the only version that is enabled in the ebuild by the IUSE="+sbcl" default. Therefore, none of the versions available on musl is enabled there, resulting in an unsatisfied REQUIRED_USE. Moving the + from sbcl to e.g. clisp would get rid of the message, but maybe this is not an acceptable solution. Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
