On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 03:23:10PM +0000, Andrey Grozin wrote: > Hello *, > > pkgcheck complains about each new version of dev-lisp/sbcl: > > UseFlagWithoutDeps: version 2.4.1: special small-files USE flag without > effect on dependencies: [ unicode ] > > The USE flag "unicode" in the sbcl ebuild has nothing to do with > installing / not installing any files, small or otherwise. It determins > whether the produced lisp will support unicode internally: > > sbcl_feature "$(usep unicode)" ":sb-unicode" > > Usually this is desirable, so, in USE we have +unicode. Is there a way to > silence these warnings?
Is there even any reason to ever disable unicode support? Point is that why have USE for it? Or does it introduce additional dependencies? -- ionen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
